Which statement is FALSE regarding PVPs for equine patients?

The statement deemed false regarding PVPs (Pharmacological Veterinary Protocols) for equine patients is that there are contraindications for prescription and administration. In the context of equine veterinary practice, the use of PVPs is generally supported by evidence highlighting their effectiveness in managing anxiety and fear-related behaviors in horses. While it is true that veterinary professionals should assess individual cases and consider any potential for adverse effects, the existence of broad contraindications is not typically a defining characteristic of PVPs.

PVPs are designed to be effective tools in reducing fear and anxiety, thus facilitating safer handling and treatment of horses in veterinary settings. Additionally, there are multiple PVPs available that cater to varied anxiety levels and conditions in horses, which means that the options can be quite extensive. While certain horses might exhibit higher Fear Assessment Scores (FAS) and require specific approaches, PVPs are not restricted solely to those cases; they can also be beneficial for horses with lesser anxiety levels. Thus, the understanding of PVPs in equine practice emphasizes their versatile use rather than a strict limitation based on FAS scores.